The Black American Party advances the producer class of the Black American community — through ownership, enterprise, constitutional principle, and economic solidarity. What is good for Black Americans is good for all Americans.
The two-axis map of American politics was not drawn with Black American interests in mind.
American politics is conventionally sorted into fiscal conservatism versus fiscal liberalism, and social conservatism versus social liberalism. Black Americans are then told to pick a quadrant, and are usually assigned one without being asked.
But the framework encodes someone else's priorities. On the questions that decide Black American outcomes - ownership, family stability, education quality, currency integrity, protection from predatory commerce - the conventional axes cut across our interests rather than along them.
Survey after survey finds Black Americans considerably more socially traditional than the party that receives their votes, and considerably more economically interventionist than the party that does not. Neither coalition represents that combination, so both ask us to abandon half of what we believe.
That is not a failure of Black American political sophistication. It is an accurate reflection of a community whose interests do not map onto a system built without it.
We decline the map. Each question is decided on whether it advances Foundational Black American prosperity and self-determination within a constitutional framework - not on whether the resulting position is recognisably left or right.
That produces a platform that looks inconsistent to people committed to the existing axes and entirely coherent to the people it was written for.
Deliberately off it. Positions are decided on whether they advance Foundational Black American prosperity and self-determination within a constitutional framework, not on whether they read as left or right.
Because it encodes priorities set elsewhere, and Black Americans are typically more socially traditional than the party that receives their votes and more economically interventionist than the one that does not.
Societies are steered deliberately. The only question is by whom and toward what.
Survival was the achievement of every previous generation. It cannot be the ambition of this one.
Analogies to other groups' experiences break down, and the breakage matters politically.
The hardest chapter to write, and the one most needed.
Emotional intensity is a strength in culture and a liability in politics.
Every people needs a protective class. Ours exists and is largely pointed away from us.
$10 a month for the private members network, business referral and local organizing.
Become a member →Twelve chapters and 200+ cited lessons. One-time $40, one year of access.
Enroll now →